CHRIST
IN WINTER: The Irrelevant Reminiscences of An Old Man—
This column starts with an entry in my journal, 1-23-12…
It occurred to me today, for the first time, that cancer was my bishop experience. It was for a short time, but had I been a bishop, that would probably have been for a short time, too.
Being a bishop had never been a grand design or a desperate goal, just a sort of generalized background assumption. Richard Raines was my bishop all through my early years in ministry, and he was my hero. I thought he was the perfect model for any preacher. I’m sure Helen was right when, as I retired, and was a bit surprised that I had not become a bishop, she said: “You never really wanted to be a bishop; you wanted to be Richard Raines.”
Throughout my years in ministry, though, I assumed that being Richard Raines meant being a bishop.
I did not want to be a bishop for the power, or the accolades, or the fame. Well, yes, probably all those things, but I really wanted to be a good preacher. The ultimate assurance of that, to me, perhaps to any Methodist preacher, was being elected as a bishop.
Also, I saw a bishop’s role as being a visionary and innovator and morale builder, creating a church that people want to join, and that people want to lead, both laity and clergy. That’s what Richard Raines did. So I thought of the bishop as the chief evangelist, helping folks into the pews, and into the ranks of the ministry.
As time went on, I came to understand that bishops had little time for those roles. Instead, they went to committee meetings and dealt with disgruntled congregations and preachers. I would have been miserable.
In
1986, my conference, Central Illinois, put Frank Nestler into candidacy for
election as a bishop. Our bishop, Leroy Hodapp, told me later that when Frank
was elected, he was going to appoint me to replace Frank as Superintendent
[asst. bishop] for the Decatur District.
That might have later led to me being nominated for a bishop position at some later time.
Frank, though, was not elected. I felt sorry for him. I felt sorry for the church. He would have been a good bishop. For me, though, it was one of the great blessings of my career. I would have been even more miserable as a District Supt than I would have been as a bishop—just as many committee meetings and disgruntled congregations and preachers, but less authority. Little time to do morale and community building, continuing education, visioning…
At the time I was appointed to Arcola, having been overlooked until all the other appointments had been made, I realized I wasn’t going to be a bishop. The powers had forgotten about me. My career was over. My working days weren’t over, but my career was over.
Then, I got cancer. And I became a bishop. I wasn’t elected, but I became the bishop of cancer.
Remember that I saw a bishop’s role, the role I wanted, as being a visionary and innovator and morale builder. I got to do that as a fellow cancer survivor.
Because I was used to standing up in front of people and talking, and because my cancer story really was interesting, and because I was willing to talk openly about even the most difficult and intimate aspects of cancer, and especially because I wrote a book about it, [1]I was in demand as a speaker at cancer conferences and support groups all over the country, and as a one-on-one counselor and friend for other cancer survivors.
It was one of the most satisfying times of my life. For about twelve years, probably about the same number of years I would have been a church bishop, I got to be a cancer bishop.
And not a single committee meeting! [2]
John Robert McFarland
1] Now That I Have Cancer I Am Whole, published by AndrewsMcMeel and HarperAudio. Translated into Czech and Japanese editions.
2]
That’s a bit disingenuous to say. When I retired, I vowed that I would never go
to another committee meeting. Almost the next day, I received a request from
the local hospital that I chair the committee to plan their first-ever National
Cancer Survivors Day celebration. How could I say no to that?






